January 3, 2009

Exclusive! 10 Questions with Jeff Bujak!


10 Questions with Jeff Bujak

By: Aaron Z. Lee



I recently had the opportunity to correspond with Jeff Bujak, a composer and instrumentalist who specializes in progressive electronica who is originally from Syracuse, but now resides in Northampton, Massachusetts.

1. You started playing the piano when you were 7, what drew you in about the piano then?

When I was seven, I was such a spaz that I’m not sure anyone took me seriously and especially when I said that I wanted to play piano and that I promised to practice everyday. But, with the great support of my family, I kept my promise. I’m not really sure why I chose piano or why I wanted to play it. The cliché would say “it chose me,” but music runs through my whole family’s blood, so it was inevitable that I would love music. I just wanted to make my own.

2. You taught yourself to play the guitar, how did that come about?

Every boy at 13 wants to play guitar. One was always available to me, so curiosity led me to transposing some of my pieces to guitar. I formed, joined and accidentally fell into many bands as guitarist, but I quickly learned that nothing is better than having all 88 notes laid out for you. I felt a little trapped playing guitar. But I also could see how it can be addicting. Strumming strings that echo in a wooden chamber against your chest can be a good experience. I just prefer using more strings and a bigger wooden chamber.

3. You’ve played in a lot of different bands and genres, was this for the love of playing music or were you looking for your niche in the world of music? Or both?

I like to test music and dissect it. And what better way to test and dissect than to actually create it yourself and then tear it apart.



4. You play a one man show, how do you arrange your music? What parts do you usually play live, or do you switch which parts you want to play?

All songs start in the studio for me. I program all my own beats and create them to accompany piano pieces that I write. I form a whole song and record it. I then just take the beats and break them up into small samples. I rearrange these samples, add new parts, flow in and out of other beat samples from other songs and play live music to them. My left hand always covers the bass lines and my laptop only runs the beats, rhythms and audio samples. My right hand takes care of all soloing, melodies, effect modulation and the layering of different sounds. My feet control the light rig I use, the volume pedals, the sustain pedals and trigger controllers. I have complete freedom to play anything I want to these beat samples without any communication or consultation with others. It’s quite a fun process.

5. Out of all the genres that you’ve worked with in the past you choose to write in a progressive electronic style, why is this?

I love progressive music for its excuse to ask “why not” instead of “why” when it comes to writing the music. Nobody judges progressive music for being too different. I love electronic music for its infinite possibilities. You can currently create almost any tone digitally and technology is getting even better everyday. Put the two together and it’s creates a style that creates more questions than answers, and I seem to like that.

6. Is there a genre that you’ve worked with in the past that you’d like to revisit that’s not progressive electronica?

I still play occasionally in a couple of bands that are very far from my current endevour’s style and it’s a nice break to connect on that side once and a while. But overall, I feel that I still have much more to learn about my own music so it keeps me intrigued. Expect much more prog electronica out of me before you see me try a prog metal project, but it will happen eventually.

7. In the list of equipment you use in your live show you don’t use an apple lap top like so many other live electronica acts. Why is this?

I started building PCs in early 2000 and I’ve learned to build a great machine. I’m just a Windows XP kind of guy. I never made the transition to Mac because I never felt that I needed to. I understand and am comfortable with PC language and how/why things work. Most of all, I’ve never felt that I was limited with my PC. I always find a way to do what I want.



8. Out of all your instruments, equipment and gadgets that you use in your music, which one is your favorite to use?

My 1974 Fender Rhodes Stage 73 electric piano is my favorite to use for reasons beyond words.

9. You use samples in your music, to you what makes a good sample and how do you get permission to use them in your music?

I never use audio samples on my studio albums; I only use them live where covers, sampling and audio replication is covered by rights organizations like ASCAP and BMI. For the legality of it, search “sampling (music)” on Wikipedia. It’s very fascinating (to me). I’ve read it back and forth to make sure I don’t do anything illegal, even though music sampling industry lawsuits sometimes spawn great exposure. Most of the time, when I use samples of other people’s music, I use it as an accent to my music and not as a basis to the song. Sometimes when I write a new beat progression, it reminds me of another song from my history. If I feel that it would fit, I like to add the sample to somewhat pay homage to my influences and what songs paved my history. One time, I created a bassline that was very similar to the famous Thriller bassline. So, I decided to go with it and use the Thriller sample to the beat that I wrote for this bassline that I created. In fact, I list every sample that I use live on my compositions page of my website. “There are no new ideas, there are only new ways of making them felt.” (- Audre Lorde) As far as finding a good sample, I feel that when done appropriately, any sample can be manipulated enough to be cool.



10. Drawing from all the projects that you’ve done, and your first solo album, where do you see your music going? Particularly on your upcoming album?

I don’t know where it may go, but I know that I will stay true to what I believe about music and I will always look to other musicians to provide solid music for me to learn from. At least for now, I can see more keyboards being used live, more computers running loopers and beats, more lights and much more of what I haven’t done in the past. I live for the excitement in music. As long as there is more to learn about music, I will be playing it. The new album will be my first venture into “over-production.” I’m not concerned about live performance on this recording. My past 2 discs have been centered on “if I can’t play it live, I won’t record it.” All of the songs on this new album are actually songs that I’ve written and have been playing live for the last year, but done studio style. Check out a full new track at www.jeffbujak.com/spine. Bam! I just had to spam the interview. Thank you for the intriguing questions, Aaron. But, I’m sure I just added more questions than I did answers. I have a tendency to do that.

Jeff Bujak is playing several dates in the Central New York Area as well as the North Eastern United States. He also has a new album due out March 3rd, 2009.

December 22, 2008

10 Questions with Microfilm!


10 Questions with Microfilm By: Aaron Z. Lee

I had the opportunity to ask Matt Mercer and Matt Keppel of the Portland, Oregon electronic band Microfilm and here are the results!

1. Your earlier works are very minimalist and German inspired, while the later works still work in this vein, your new work on the Slingshot Orchestra leans toward more of a synth-pop aesthetic. Is that a latent taste that you guys have always had or did you guys have an epiphany and start working in that direction? And if it was an epiphany, can you tell us about that?

Mercer: It’s been an organic evolution. My solo music is more angular and fragmented, sometimes a bit harder, and the earliest Microfilm tracks are more a reflection of this; I think these new tracks are more collaborative and have veered into something more lush.

Keppel: I don’t know if it was an epiphany or even a discussed decision, I think we just started writing songs that were a little more musical, more complex, maybe a bit softer then the first album.

2. How did you guys arrive at creating a cover, that I think is better than the original, of Sufjan Steven’s song “Chicago”?

Keppel: Better? Well, thanks for that! We’re both fans of Sufjan’s music and decided we wanted to do our first cover version and I think I suggested ‘Chicago’. I think we wanted to cover a song that was a completely different genre and try to make it fit into an electronic, dance realm. It wouldn’t be very interesting for someone like us to cover, say, the Pet Shop Boys.

Mercer: We both liked the song, and it represented a moment in time for us, being enthusiastic about our city of residence… ironically, not long after we decided to leave for Portland! But with that cover we really strived to recreate all the various layers of the original arrangement, but in new and different ways. For instance, I played a lot of piano parts from ear and then cut it apart into fragments, and we recorded numerous layers of vocals to give it a different harmonic sensibility…. but we felt that a good song is a good song, and we didn’t want to rewrite the song itself and wanted to honor it as much as possible.

3. You also worked on a cover of “The Desperate Things You Made Me Do” for a Magnetic Fields cover album. How did this come about?

Keppel: We saw a post on the blog The Music Slut about a Chicago singer/songwriter who was compiling a covers album of Magnetic Fields tunes and he was looking for submissions. We’re both big fans of Magnetic Fields and so we wrote the guy and asked him if he’d like a submission from us and he said yes. Pretty simple.

4. Out of all the songs by the Magnetic Fields, what made you choose that one?

Mercer: I’ve always been more interested in Stephin Merrit’s earlier, stranger synth-pop flirtations. I like the weird sounds he uses; they all sound sort of cheap (in a good way). This one seemed the most dancefloor-ready, something we could have fun with without removing it too far from the source. It’s actually a relatively complex song and it was fun to dissect it… plus, it has one of the more memorable pop choruses of our time, in my opinion!

5. Your vocals have a very signature sound to them, sometimes they are processed and sometimes not. What kind of processes do you guys run your vocals through?

Mercer: It varies. Sometimes the vocals are more “naked” where we just add some reverb to them and let them shine on their own; at other times we add a lot of effects to give it some more edge. Early on we experimented a lot with the detuned unison effect that you hear on tracks like “Paris”, where Keppel’s voice sounds slightly disembodied… this is a treatment we continue to explore as a unifying element.

6. There are many classical instruments heard throughout “The Slingshot Orchestra”, including piano and violin. Where did this idea come from?

Mercer: Part of it is sheer intrigue of what’s become possible via software. Almost all of those instruments are digital instruments, and I “played” them using a midi keyboard. We liked the juxtaposition of hard and soft, synthetic and organic. That sense of contrast is, of course, nothing new, but I think we struck a healthy balance between those two worlds.

7. Do you guys have a favorite classical composer?

Mercer: I studied classical organ and piano growing up, and my favorite composer was always Chopin. I listen to more adventurous 20th century neoclassical music as well as a lot of stuff in between, but Chopin will always be special to me for reasons that are hard to articulate.

8. Who exactly is Johnny X and how did he lose his girl to Erlend Oye?

Keppel: It’s just a character I created for the song. Haven’t really been that specific with characters in my lyrics yet, but thought I would write one of those “name” songs. The title supposed to be a bit Ramones-y. I thought it was funny that this guy would lose a girlfriend to someone like Erlend Oye, who seems a bit bespectacled and kind of wimpy; he’s an anti-hero of the un-cliched variety.

9. What song or artist is stuck in your head today?

Keppel: Good song? ‘Old Fools’ by Magnetic Fields. Bad song? ‘She’s Not Me’ by Madonna; a terrible, terrible song.

Mercer: A handful of artists I’ve really been enjoying lately are Booka Shade, Andy Stott, Grouper, Alias, Mountains, Lindstrøm, James Din A4… the list always goes on, but those are some current favorites.

10. There’s been a lot of snow hitting the ground up here in the North East United States, Does it look like you guys will have snow over there in Oregon for Christmas after all?



Mercer:
Yes, and neither of us is happy about it.

Keppel: Well, I like it from the inside, but it needs to all melt come Dec. 26th.

Thanks for doing this interview and Happy Holidays!



Microfilm – We Are Terribly Sorry For Your Loss

Microfilm Myspace

Powered by WordPress